5/31/2023 0 Comments Wordify wp review![]() ![]() One query related to an abbreviation – you used OntoNotes Normal Forms early in the document, which you then (correctly) abbreviated to ONF. Your issue appears to be that the editor double-checked two subject-specific things with you, but we believe that that was the correct course of action in both cases – to ensure consistency, it's not the editor’s job to make assumptions about your text. We've reviewed the job internally, as we always do in cases like this, and haven't been able to find any errors in the language editing. 550 revisions of which half were insertions and the other half deletions. However, they are there to smooth out language and correct any grammatical misuse they are not academic supervisors and do not offer peer-review services or rewrites of academic material. Our editors are advanced-level postgraduates with a vast experience. Please be assured that all Wordy edits are undertaken to the highest standards and that all clients are treated with respect and professional courtesy. Thanks, Abdulrahman, we're sorry that we weren't able to meet your expectations for this job. Reply from | Proofreading and copyediting Aug 22, 2022 If anyone is interested to see their proofread copy and how they treat me, feel free to reach out. I have tried two other services and I had an incredible experience. ![]() I do not really care about what I paid anymore and I do not want the refund, but it is extremely annoying when they treat you as a fool, just because you are not a native speaker. And by the way, they haven't refunded me. I said ok, but honestly as a customer, I believe that effort and time are meaningless if there is no quality. He offered 50% refund, suggesting that the editor had put time and effort and they deserved to be paid. They eventually sent the document to their CEO, "Anders Schepelern" and he seemed to agree with some of my comments. Anyway, I understand mistakes can happen with anyone so I contacted the support and I explained what happened. They suggested that they might have used an automatic correction tool, such as, grammarly, and that is why some of the comments did not make sense. They were surprised and shocked by the proofreader's comments, and they also agreed with what I said. I gave the proofread copy to my lab mates, English native speakers. I am not a native English speaker, but I am not a fool. Another problem was the editor did not put any effort into understanding some technical famous concepts (which is fine, but in our chat, the editor insisted that these concepts are known to her and the highlighted part was for something else). For example, the editor did not read abbreviations for some previously defined concepts, and the editor marked the abbreviations as mistakes. When the editor finished, I found out that many mistakes had been made. I submitted a document, and the editor "L***" decided to proofread it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |